Signup for our free newsletter:

Drawing Parallels to the Great Depression

Written By Brian Hicks

Posted July 10, 2010

Welcome to the Wealth Daily Weekend Edition — our insights from the week in investing and links to our most-read Wealth Daily and sister publication articles.

With all the talk about the Great Depression over the last few weeks, I thought it would be worthwhile to get an opinion on what caused the first one.

It comes to us courtesy of Marriner S. Eccles, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1934 to1948 — think of him as the Ben Bernanke of his day.

In his 1951 memoir, Beckoning Frontiers, Eccles detailed what he believed caused the massive downturn.

If you’re willing, I’d like to you read along and ponder the parallels the former Fed Chief presents.

In the aftermath, Eccles wrote:

As mass production has to be accompanied by mass consumption, mass consumption, in turn, implies a distribution of wealth — not of existing wealth, but of wealth as it is currently produced — to provide men with buying power equal to the amount of goods and services offered by the nation’s economic machinery. (emphasis in original)

Instead of achieving that kind of distribution, a giant suction pump had by 1929-30 drawn into a few hands an increasing portion of currently produced wealth. This served them as capital accumulations. But by taking purchasing power out of the hands of mass consumers, the savers denied to themselves the kind of effective demand for their products that would justify a reinvestment of their capital accumulations in new plants. In consequence, as in a poker game where the chips were concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, the other fellows could stay in the game only by borrowing. When their credit ran out, the game stopped.

That is what happened to us in the twenties. We sustained high levels of employment in that period with the aid of an exceptional expansion of debt outside of the banking system. This debt was provided by the large growth of business savings as well as savings by individuals, particularly in the upper-income groups where taxes were relatively low. Private debt outside of the banking system increased about fifty per cent. This debt, which was at high interest rates, largely took the form of mortgage debt on housing, office, and hotel structures, consumer installment debt, brokers’ loans, and foreign debt. The stimulation to spending by debt-creation of this sort was short-lived and could not be counted on to sustain high levels of employment for long periods of time. Had there been a better distribution of the current income from the national product — in other words, had there been less savings by business and the higher-income groups and more income in the lower groups — we should have had far greater stability in our economy. Had the six billion dollars, for instance, that were loaned by corporations and wealthy individuals for stock-market speculation been distributed to the public as lower prices or higher wages and with less profits to the corporations and the well-to-do, it would have prevented or greatly moderated the economic collapse that began at the end of 1929.

The time came when there were no more poker chips to be loaned on credit. Debtors thereupon were forced to curtail their consumption in an effort to create a margin that could be applied to the reduction of outstanding debts. This naturally reduced the demand for goods of all kinds and brought on what seemed to be overproduction, but was in reality underconsumption when judged in terms of the real world instead of the money world. This, in turn, brought about a fall in prices and employment. (emphasis mine)

Unemployment further decreased the consumption of goods, which further increased unemployment, thus closing the circle in a continuing decline of prices. Earnings began to disappear, requiring economies of all kinds in the wages, salaries, and time of those employed. And thus again the vicious circle of deflation was closed until one third of the entire working population was unemployed, with our national income reduced by fifty per cent, and with the aggregate debt burden greater than ever before, not in dollars, but measured by current values and income that represented the ability to pay. Fixed charges, such as taxes, railroad and other utility rates, insurance and interest charges, clung close to the 1929 level and required such a portion of the national income to meet them that the amount left for consumption of goods was not sufficient to support the population.

This then, was my reading of what brought on the depression.

Now does any of that sound familiar?

However, that doesn’t mean that the ghost of Tom Joad is ready to ride again…

After all, no two historical events are exactly alike and ours is a story that is still being written.

Even so, you can’t help but wonder about the road that lies ahead.

For investors, the key will be in looking beyond the fear to the future. Because as this crisis clears — and it eventually must — it will represent one of the greatest buying opportunities of all time.

That much I’m sure of.

By the way, here’s something else you need to know about the Great Depression: The stock market bottomed long before the crisis itself ended.

In reality, stocks actually bottomed in July 1932 before the next uptrend began.

That was long before FDR took office and delivered his first fireside chat.

Just some food for thought.

Below are a few this week’s best investment ideas from the pages of this week’s top-read articles in Wealth Daily and our sister publications, Energy & Capital and Green Chip Stocks.

Enjoy the weekend,

steve sig

Steve Christ
Editor, Wealth Daily

Why Silver will Always Beat Gold: The Magic Ratio
Editor Luke Burgess explains to readers why silver investments always beat gold in uncertain markets, thanks to the “magic ratio”.

Is Mongolia the Next Dubai?: The Story of Stalin’s Lost Oil
Energy and Capital Editor Christian DeHaemer shares his insider intel as to why Mongolia is about to ride the Chinese oil-craze into a golden age.

4 Reasons to Own Google (NASDAQ: GOOG): The Bullish Case for Google
Wealth Daily Analyst Adam Sharp makes the bullish case for Google (GOOG) shares.

Carbon Emissions Investing: 5 Stocks to Own Before Washington Puts a Price on Carbon
Green Chip Editor Jeff Siegel discusses the coming energy bill and the opportunities it could offer for investors.

Asia Establishes Cleantech Dominance: China is Best in Breed
Energy & Capital‘s Nick Hodge profiles clean energy process in Asia, and offers a few ways to profit from their energy hunger.

Like Gold, Only Better: This Industry Metal Pays Out $12,890 For Every Car Made
Wealth Daily metals guru and editor Luke Burgess takes a look under the hood as he tracks down a big opportunity in the auto industry’s $7.9 billion bull market.

Energy Efficiency Emerges as Strongest Cleantech Sector: My Chat with the Street’s Most Powerful Investment Bankers
Green Chip Editor Nick Hodge goes over data presented by Wall Street bankers at a recent energy conference, and concludes that efficiency is the best investment right now.

Technical Analysis for Beginners: Trading Secrets You Need to Know
Editor Ian Cooper explains how five simple technical trading tools can help make profits in any market.

Electric Vehicle Investing: Something Every Investor Needs to Know about Electric Vehicles
Green Chip Editor Jeff Siegel discusses the realities of electric vehicle market and names one stock investors should consider.

The Race for a Cure: Beating a Baby Boomer’s Worst Nightmare
Publisher Brian Hicks details an up-and-coming biotech company working to curing what Brian calls “the Grey Plague”. Brian says this cure is going to be one of the greatest investment opportunities of our time.