Download now: The Downfall of Cable, and the Rise of 5G!

Drug Development: From Preclinical Trials to PDUFA Dates

Written by Samuel Taube
Posted March 17, 2019

Drugs are expensive here in America. We can all agree on that, even if we disagree politically about what to do about it.

But there’s a flipside to the high prices we pay for medications. Our country’s biotech market funds most of the world’s drug research and development. And it has delivered incredible gains to investors over the years.

drug development, preclinical trials, pdufa dates, index

If you had invested $10,000 in the S&P 500 10 years ago, you’d have more than $37,000 today. But if you had put it in the iShares Nasdaq Biotechnology ETF (NASDAQ: IBB), you’d have more than $52,000.

And that’s arguably the simplest and most passive biotech investing strategy possible. If you buy individual, early-stage drug developer stocks at the right moments, you can see much bigger gains in much shorter time frames.

A $10,000 investment in Generex Biotechnology (OTC: GNBT) would have ballooned into almost $100,000 in one month if you had bought in early October 2018.

drug development, preclinical trials, pdufa dates, generex, stock

What makes huge gains like this happen so quickly?

Put simply, these gains in small biotech stocks happen on important catalyst dates in the drug development process. These catalyst dates include clinical trial results, approval decisions, and other key milestones in the birth of a new medication.  

This is the basis of biotech industry expert and Wealth Daily contributor Jason Stutman’s new research service, Topline Trader. And today, I’ve convinced him to let me do something a bit crazy. I’ve convinced him to let me publish Topline Trader’s comprehensive guide to the drug development process right here on Wealth Daily.

Below, you’ll find a detailed description of every step in a new drug’s journey to approval — from preclinical trials to PDUFA dates. Let’s start at the beginning...

Preclinical Trials

Before a drug can be tested in humans, researchers must determine whether or not the drug is reasonably safe for initial use in humans — and whether or not it’s promising enough to justify the arduous commercial development process.

Preclinical testing can be done through either in vitro or in vivo methods. This means the testing is done in plastic/glass vessels, or in animal (non-human) models.

Preclinical studies are typically small but must provide detailed information on dosing and toxicity levels. After preclinical testing, researchers review their findings and decide whether or not to advance the drug through national regulatory agencies.

When a product is identified as a viable candidate for further development, a company gathers preclinical data and submits it to advance into clinical trials as an investigational new drug (IND).

IND (Investigational New Drug) Application

Federal law requires that a drug must be approved for commercialization before it is transported across state lines. And that’s kind of a problem for drug developers.

During the clinical development process, they will need to ship an investigational drug to clinical investigators across many states, so there needs to be a workaround.

An IND application is the means by which a company obtains an exemption to this rule, allowing them to ship their drug candidate to and from labs throughout the development process.

The IND application is basically a bridge between animal studies and human studies. When a drug developer is satisfied with preclinical trials, they submit an IND application to the FDA in order to move to the clinical stage.

This is the point where a preclinical molecule changes in legal status and becomes a new drug subject to specific requirements of the drug regulatory system.

An IND application must contain information in three main areas:

  • First, preclinical data from in vitro and/or in vivo animal studies will be used to assess whether or not it's reasonably safe for initial testing in humans.
  • Second, information pertaining to the manufacture of the drug will be assessed. The FDA needs assurance that the company can produce and supply consistent batches of the drug.
  • Third, detailed protocols for proposed clinical studies. The FDA will want to make sure the study is sound and that the company is committed to adhering to investigational new drug regulations.

Once the IND is submitted, the company must wait 30 days before initiating any clinical trials. During this time, the FDA has an opportunity to review and potentially deny the IND.

Clinical Phases

Following a successful IND application, drug developers move from preclinical trials to clinical trials, meaning testing in people. The clinical testing process takes place in several stages, each of which serves a specific purpose.

Phase I

Phase I is the first phase in clinical drug development. The primary purpose of Phase I is to determine safety and proper dosage of the IND.

These studies typically take several months to complete, and contain between 20 and 100 volunteers. Most INDs — about 70%, in fact — make it through Phase I.

Phase II

Phase II is the second phase in clinical drug development. The primary purpose of Phase II is to determine the efficacy and side effects of an IND. As a measure of efficacy, Phase II is a critical stage in the development of a drug candidate. Top-line results for Phase II should be regarded as one of the largest catalyst events in development.

Phase II studies consist of up to several hundred people with the disease or condition being targeted. Studies can last between several months and two years. Approximately 33% of drugs make it through Phase II.

Successful completion of Phase II clinical trials is often a good marker of when to buy shares in an early-stage drug developer. If their new drug gets through Phase II trials, it has a decent chance of approval; but you still have a decent chance of locking in big gains after its Phase III completion or PDUFA date — more on that in a moment.

Phase III

Phase III is the third phase of clinical trial development. The primary purpose of Phase III is to monitor adverse reactions and further study efficacy. In effect, Phase III is a more expansive Phase II.

That said, top-line results for Phase III can have a strong impact on share value. This is particularly the case when Phase III data conflicts with positive Phase II data, forcing a company to halt development.

Phase III studies look at a wider population than Phase II, with between 300 and 3,000 volunteers who have the targeted disease or condition. These studies are also longer, between one and three years.

Given the length and complexity of Phase III trials, positive results from these trials can send an early-stage drug maker’s stock price soaring. Some biotech traders choose to sell at that point — others wait until later in the process.

Phase IV

Phase IV is the final phase of clinical trial development. It is typically less consequential than Phases II and III, because it usually takes place after the FDA approves the marketing of a drug. The primary purpose of Phase IV is to gain additional information, which will be used to help refine a drug's development.

NDA (New Drug Application)

NDA stands for New Drug Application, the document that drug developers submit to the FDA when ready to commercialize a new pipeline candidate. The purpose of an NDA is to demonstrate that a drug is safe and effective for its intended use.

It describes what happened during the clinical trials, what the ingredients are, the results of the animal studies, how the drug behaves in the body, and how it is manufactured.

Drug developers must include everything about a drug in their NDA, from preclinical data to Phase III trial data. Developers must include reports on all studies, data, and analyses.

Along with clinical results, developers must also include proposed labeling, safety updates, drug abuse information, patent information, any international data, and directions for use.

Once received, the NDA enters FDA Review.

FDA Review

Once the FDA receives an NDA, a review team decides if the application is complete. If the NDA is not complete, then the review team can refuse to file and request an amended NDA from the drug developer.

If the NDA is complete, the review team will take between six and 10 months to make a decision on whether or not to approve the drug.

In making its decision to approve or deny a drug, the FDA will consider a number of factors, with three primary components:

  • First, the FDA will determine whether the drug is safe and effective, and whether its benefits outweigh the risks.
  • Second, the FDA will make sure the drug's proposed labeling is appropriate.
  • Third, the FDA will consider manufacturing methods and controls used to maintain the drug's quality. Those methods will need to be adequate to preserve the drug's identity, strength, quality, and purity.

PDUFA Decision

It’s hard to think of a more important catalyst for an early-stage biotech company than the date when it learns whether or not the FDA has approved its new drug.

Approval isn’t exactly a quick process, but the FDA is nice enough to give drug companies a deadline by which they’ll (usually) reach a final decision. It’s called the PDUFA date, and it can send smaller companies soaring double or triple digits in a single day.

The unwieldy acronym “PDUFA” stands for Prescription Drug User Fee Act, a 1992 law that compels biotech companies to pay the FDA for a quick review process and a publicly announced approval or rejection deadline.

The law was intended to serve as a truce between exasperated drug makers and an overworked FDA. Before its passage, the FDA took even longer to review new drugs due to funding and manpower shortages.

Today, it’s a crucial catalyst for the smart money in the biotech industry. If you’re investing in an early-stage drug maker, you need to know its products’ PDUFA dates.

Like Phase III trial results, a positive PDUFA decision can cause a massive spike in the stock price of a drug’s developer. It’s a great opportunity for traders who bought the stock after Phase II trials (or before) to sell and lock in their gains.

Can You Follow This Process Yourself?

In theory, you could track a drug’s progression through this maze-like process all by yourself. You’d just need to have a fairly advanced knowledge of chemistry, biology and medicine, and enough free time to constantly monitor all of the world’s major medical journals, government communiqués, biotech company media releases, and news outlets. Easy, right?

Look, there’s a reason why biotech investors can easily win triple- or quadruple-digit gains on early-stage drug developer stocks: Most investors don’t know how to follow this process.

They might buy winning biotech stocks reactively — after news of a successful trial or approval decision makes headlines, but that’s too late to capture the biggest gains. Only the smart money knows to buy these stocks proactively — before major catalysts happen — because only the smart money knows when they’re coming up.

For the last few years, Jason Stutman has been trying to solve the problem of how to teach regular, non-biotech experts like you and me how to track these dates.

Recently, he’s found an ingeniously simple solution. Jason may not be able to turn us all into biotech experts, but he can connect us to his global network of doctors, scientists, and industry experts, who in turn can notify us of upcoming profit catalysts in the biotech world.

That solution has evolved into the Topline Trader research service. And next month, Jason is hosting the first ever Topline Trader Summit. This free event will teach you the basics of the data-driven biotech investing system that is already locking in huge gains for subscribers. Stay tuned for more info in the next few weeks.

Until next time,

Monica Savaglia

Samuel Taube

Samuel Taube brings years of experience researching ETFs, cryptocurrencies, muni bonds, value stocks, and more to Wealth Daily. He has been writing for investment newsletters since 2013 and has penned articles accurately predicting financial market reactions to Brexit, the election of Donald Trump, and more. Samuel holds a degree in economics from the University of Maryland, and his investment approach focuses on finding undervalued assets at every point in the business cycle and then reaping big returns when they recover. To learn more about Samuel, click here.

Comments

Buffett's Envy: 50% Annual Returns, Guaranteed