Oil Price Spike

The November 2008 Oil Bombshell

By
Friday, May 23rd, 2008

Wall Street cannot afford to short the oil market.

All bets are now off on just how high oil will run. $200 a barrel may be the least of our worries come this November 2008.

And it's all thanks to a continued failure to account for peak oil, rising demand, supply erosion, and the continued death of the dollar, which will spawn super spikes feeding on supply disruption, geopolitical tension, demand and weather.

Just be prepared for the super oil price spike that sends tank prices well above $5 a gallon... maybe even $12 by 2012.

 

Oil Chart May 23

 

Sure, price differences between near-term and long-term oil futures contracts point to a near-term fall on technicals, but as long as demand continues to grow with little supply, we're not willing to call the end of the oil rally.

The only time we can call the oil top is when supply finally eclipses demand, which will happen when ordinary consumers can no longer afford energy costs. When that happens, we'll talk of an oil rally top.

$200 Oil Sounds Nuts? Predictions for $12 a Gallon are Now Inevitable...

We've all heard the $200 oil forecasts.

Goldman just raised its oil price outlook to $141 from $107, citing supply issues.

Arjun Murti believes that we could see $150 to $200 oil over the next six to 24 months.

OPEC President Chakib Khelil won't rule out $200.

But now comes the forecast for $12 for a gallon of gas, says Robert Hirsch, Management Information Services Senior Energy Advisor.

"[T]he prices that we're paying at the pump today are, I think, going to be ‘the good old days,' because others who watch this very closely forecast that we're going to be hitting $12 and $15 per gallon," Hirsch said.

"And then, after that, when oil - world oil production goes into decline, we're going to talk about rationing. In other words, not only are we going to be paying high prices and have considerable economic problems, but in addition to that, we're not going to be able to get the fuel when we want it."

While Hirsch has later said $12 to $15 wasn't his prediction, instead citing Charles T. Maxwell, he did admit that the high prices were inevitable.

Maxwell, on the other hand, an energy analyst, expects the oil-induced financial malaise to run from 2010 to 2015. Unlike the recession the U.S. appears to be in today, "This will not be six months of hell and then we come out of it."

Instead, he expects the crisis to last upwards of 12 years, "as the world goes through a prolonged period of price-induced rationing (e.g. oil up to $300 a barrel and U.S. pump prices up to $15 a gallon)..."

Says The $20 Trillion Report's Brian Hicks, "The investment that needs to be made into the energy complex to meet surging energy demand is mind-boggling..."

The Super Spike of November 2008

While the International Energy Agency's oil supply forecast won't be released until November 2008, there's growing fear of a sharp downward revision in supplies. That means supply could be much tighter than previously thought, a nightmare scenario if proven true.

Any pessimistic IEA view will shock the market, spawning oil super spikes. We've already seen prices rocket to $130, doubling year over year. And it'll only get worse on a dismal IEA forecast.

For years, the IEA has said that crude supplies and other liquid fuels would keep up with rising demand, topping 116 million barrels a day by 2030. But now there's fear that the IEA, basing findings on aging oil fields, could revise sharply lower and warn of a struggle to keep up with 100 million barrel a day demand over the next 20 years.

That's called Peak Oil. And it's a dangerous situation.

But IEA pessimism is nothing new. Just last summer, the IEA warned that spare OPEC capacity could fall to "minimal levels by 2012."

Even the U.S. Energy Department is embarking on its own supply studies, which could be finished by summer. But they, too, may have nothing positive to say. They already suggest that daily 73 million barrel daily output will level off at 84 million barrels. To then reach 100 million barrels a day by 2030, we'll need a sizeable boost from other fuel sources.

Your best bet in this market. Buy and hold energy stocks. They're going much higher. Better still, you can always buy oil at $73... sorry, $78 days after the initial Pure Energy Trader recommendation.

Listen, I've said this before. I'll say it again. We're not economically pessimistic at Wealth Daily. But we won't put on the rose-colored glasses, and tell you everything's okay. We're simply trying to profit from an eventual "blood in the streets" investing scenario.

The Solution to Oil Woes... Sue OPEC?

As I said in my The Trader's Pit blog, in case you missed it:

Five months into 2008, and we learn:

It's okay to believe in aliens.

Scientists got the okay to mix animal and human embryos.

The House wants to sue OPEC... this'll end well.

Yep, the House wants to sue OPEC for "limiting oil supplies and working together to set crude prices."

The bill, if passed, would subject OPEC oil producers, including Saudi Arabia and Venezuela to the same antitrust laws that U.S. companies follow. Can you imagine the Chavez reaction?

The idea passed 324-84, which means a presidential veto is overridden. "This bill guarantees that oil prices will reflect supply and demand economic rules, instead of wildly speculative and perhaps illegal activities," said Democratic Rep. Steve Kagen of Wisconsin, who sponsored the legislation.

Fortunately, the White House opposes it, saying that "targeting OPEC investment in the United States as a source for damage awards "would likely spur retaliatory action against American interests in those countries and lead to a reduction in oil available to U.S. refiners."

The bill would still be subject to Senate approval.

Here's an idea. If you want to reduce dependence on OPEC, hire engineers and companies that can find domestic oil. Instead, Congress wants to attack OPEC, which can reduce supply and drive prices higher, with an army of attorneys.

Yep, that's a great idea.

I'd love to hear what you think, too. Please leave comments below.

Now if you'll excuse me, running with my scissors just became a good idea, too.

Ian L. Cooper
http://www.wealthdaily.com


Media / Interview Requests? Click Here.






Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (30 votes)




Comments:

Comment by RMWright on 2008-05-23
The US is going to become an increasingly dangerous country as it plummets to being a third rate power.While it is convenient to blame Congress, the public gets exactly the representation it deserves.I doubt one quarter of the public could tell you where we get most of out oil from.When idiots vote, fools are elected.This may be a clue as to how the US has destroyed its vast advantages in the past 50 years.
Comment by HTD on 2008-05-23
Well, I've got to hand it to Congress - they've finally made me agree with Bush on something. Suing OPEC is the silliest, scariest, stupidest, most ill-conceived, head-in-the-sand idea that one could possibly imagine. It should end up in "News of the Weird" as most assinine governmental action, certainly, of this decade. Of all the things we could do to prevent oil price rises (reduce consumption, alt energy, use more wisely) this is the most counter-productive one out there. Sort of like the "gas-tax holiday" boomerang. Isn't it a glory we have such well-paid public servants to think up such ridiculousness?
Comment by Curtis Cerenzie on 2008-05-23
What will it take for the American people to figure out they've elected a bunch of idealists to Congress who haven't a clue how to run anything, including the country. The ideas and thoughts coming out of Congress seem so off base and out of touch with market fundamentals and understanding of how markets work. I don't questions their intentions, but it's clear they don't know what they are doing. It seems like a great idea to work on conservation and alternative energy. Clearly this helps on the demand side of the equation. But for some reason, the idea of adding supply is supposed to be politically incorrect. These guys are morons. Unfortunately most of the American people are buying into it...
Comment by Thomas Scarpinatto on 2008-05-23
Ian,

I've seen this coming for years. We should be going full steam with algae development so that we can fuel our freighters and cars. Who out there is doing this that we can invest in?

Thomas
Comment by Hal Gates on 2008-05-23
Nowhere on planet earth can you assemble 535 idiots with less knowledge about the petroleum industry than the 535 assembled under the Dome of the Capitol of the United States. Plus the "blow-hard" Bill O'Reilly
Comment by Steven Johnson on 2008-05-23
Sueing OPEC is about a smart an idea as invading IRAQ!!
Comment by jean loubet on 2008-05-23
Will congressional arrogance bordering onstupidity never end ? Good article
Comment by Phil C on 2008-05-23
While we would all like to hold OPEC accountable for the price of oil, suing them is dumb. Where do these elected officials think such an action is going? Of course there would be retaliation, which would probably escalate to a conflict at some point. There's plenty of oil right here, if only the tree huggers would let our companies drill for it.
Comment by Paul on 2008-05-23
Since the Bush/Cheney energy plan has kicked in look at what's happened. think of waht might have happend if instead of the bogus invasion of Iraq we had spent the same amount of money becoming independent of outside sources of energy? Vote for a change of mindset, vote for Obama.
Comment by Mark Zabel on 2008-05-23
With foriegn oil being so expensive, I hear there are alternatives that are popping up all over the country, with biofuels made with vegtable oil, and the oil that is in back of fast food restaurants. AlsoI hear GM has cars that can run on seawater the problem is the oil companys are keeping all these alternatives off the market.If we can perfect solar power and keep the oil companys from buying the patents we could go foward and find the energy source needed to supply us with low cost.
Comment by NORM REUTER on 2008-05-23
I think the average consumer who has to pay through the nose for fuel for their car, should add a line to their tax form (as a direct cash refund). This line should read "fuel/transportation costs that exceed $3 per gallon". This deduction is allowed due to idiot congressional representation who have no back-up plan, for oil.
Comment by Franklin D Burgess on 2008-05-23
Do not believe we voted for Congress to have juisditional authority over a foreign organization such as OPEC or the
UN.
As of this date Congress has rejected more requests than what has been passed. That sounds sort of scarry to this writer. Interpolated, they are so busy saying "NO" that either saying
"Yes" or "Maybe" would be insulting to the voters who gave them their jobs and perform to obtain results. Will bet the person who does not have a job to support his/her livelihood would
be glad to take their job at half the cost, would be more accountable. It is a sad state of for our national affairs to be even discussing this subject and wasting tax payer's money.
Comment by RGraham on 2008-05-23
Its apparent that not too many people, including our elected officials, bafoons that most of them are (ie. Maxine Water's most recent comments ), have a clue to the true nature of the current state of affairs. Check this out. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3340274697167011147 Copy and paste in your browser to discover The Truth. Any comments would be appreciated. Helmuts on, mouthpieces in !
Comment by Ian Thompson on 2008-05-23
I agree finding more makes more sence than suing OPEC.You might be interested to know , 91 unleaded petrol just went over $2.00 per liter here in New Zealand.
regards Ian
Comment by Jeff Stott on 2008-05-24
People comment but they never give solutions. First we put a couple of companies out of business. Starting with Venezuela's gas company in the USA. Congress establishes the Annual Carburator Contest. 1 million award for the best MPG for specific vehicle models. I am talking 40 to 50 MPG for SUV's. We drill in the US and mine oil Shale. There is an unlimited supply. Fully develope the Technology. It is congress that has stopped progress in this country. Term limits is absolute. We need to build at least 6 refineries. Now.
Jeff
Comment by Kevin Padfield on 2008-05-24
Apparently a substantial number of the people in congress are suffering from a messiah complex. They think that all they have to do to wave their arms and the rest of the world will automatically do their bidding. All I can say is that if they think that they really have that kind of power that they should suspend the law of gravity around the Kennedy Space Center just prior to every rocket launch and then they could put a whole lot more payload into space.
What total freaking idiots!!!
Comment by Phil Fields on 2008-05-24
thank God someone is doing something. Lord knows, the administration has purposefully resigned its responsibilities for the past 7 years, resultingin this mess. Face it!! We simply do not have any great supply of oil in the USA. Stop following the wishlist of the adminisstration and get serious.
Comment by Jerry D on 2008-05-24
In the late 60's I was involved with producing a paper for the VP of our (Major Oil) company to present to the Congress who were evaluating repealing the oil exploration tax refund that allowed oil companies to drill for oil, and which somewhat compensated for the effect of drilling "dry holes".
After an in-depth presentation and its attendant discussions, the VP returned to our office and when asked what had happened in Washington the previous day, he stated, "They simply are not willing to believe that the US can ever be short of oil!"

Ian, when you take the most popular (person) ((substitute farmer, retailer, politician, doctor, etc.)) in any district and put him/her (and others like him) in Congress, it does not mean he will be a Congressman capable of understanding the technical problems which we are depending on him to legislate!!
I will forever assign full blame for this problem on the Congress, and for the continuing of their errant schemes and their inactions. And, gee, it has only been 40 years of this attitude!
If they had reacted when they had the chances, we would not be in this place now!
Comment by MC DuPree on 2008-05-24
What is it with the reps in Wisconsin? Anyone remember that the Real ID Act is still on the books? Never heard of it? Google it and learn. Now we have Kagan from Wisconsin wanting to sue OPEC? Absurd. Quite frankly, I wonder if anyone can make enough money to stay out of the way of the chaos that will surely result if this article's predictions come true. I'm not saying I doubt it. I'm scared.
Comment by jim meyer on 2008-05-24
I am ashamed of some of the things that come out of Wisconsin. This guy sounds like something even more ridiculous than "Tailgunner" Joe McCarthy and his commie witch hunts. At least we still have those sensible souls like Ed Guene and Jeffry Dahmer to look up to.
Yeah, the locals are blaming the Government for gas prices. One guy's comeback to my peak oil comments was to ask me what kind of mileage my truck gets. WHen i told him 20 local and 26 on long hauls, he says "Well mine gets 8" as if it were my fault. He drives here and there just to see what other people are doing in their yards. (My truck sits in the driveway for days at a time) Now let's rip into NASCAR Nation. Thousands of Winnebagoes, pulling SUVs tied up in traffic jams, just to watch 42 idiots turning left as fast as they can fo 3 hours.

Thanks for some of your calls. It has gotten to the point that I don't think twice about your recommendations. I sold half of my KOL position. I can lose all of the second half and still have a profit.

Sensible in Wisconsin
Comment by Farber Trole' on 2008-05-24
In the 80's Brazil was one of the 3rd world countries in which our Brilliant Bankers lost all that $$ from loans that we bailed them out of. Yet, while we allowed Lobbyists to rule, and our Politicians to squander our children's future, the 3rd Worlders were busy making themselves energy efficient. Even when we decide on something like ethanol - we allow the $$ to rule to choice. Brazil got it right - perhaps we should vote for them in November.

Our Politicians are self-serving Idiots, and so are those who wave their flags promoting the next round of scum in office.
Comment by fred ruppert on 2008-05-24
We need less intrusion by the Feds in the marketplace, and suing OPEC is about as brainless as I've ever heard. Let's face it---the oil product is now an item to be auctioned to the highest bidder, because the demand exceeds the supply, and when there are more bidders than sellers, the prices will rise. Please remember the effects of the Smoot-Hawley bill back in the 30s---it ruined our economy and strained relations with other nations. Let's not repeat that move. Fred
Comment by Wayne Hunter on 2008-05-24
The "green brained crackpots" have done enough damage.
Let supply and demand work!

Get rid of the "reprobate minded environmental idea" that prevents our engineres and bussines from oporating normally. Then you will see competition bring prices way down!

Comment by mk on 2008-05-24
Stop obsessing on the oil supply and find ways to encourage electric or hybrid car production and usage. Nuclear power and/or coal gasification for increased power supply goes hand in hand with the goal of reducing dependence on oil supplies for transportation and energy. There are enough other things that the dwindling oil supply is needed for. We (the public and the administration) need to face facts and to stop ignoring the truth.
Comment by Lane Brugman on 2008-05-24
I am a sixteen year old high school student and I am flabergasted that almost all politicians are turning a blind eye to this problem. Sueing OPEC would be the worst thing to do. We need to stop founding these countrties and instead, put the money back into the US market. New technologies are ready but need funding. The government just needs to get out of the "oil tunnel" and look around at all the other technologies and ideas that could transform our country while boosting the economy.
Comment by Andy Prince on 2008-05-25
I would suggest that beside looking for new resources the "World Oil Users Association"
i.e. anybody using oil, well thats all of us, take over the wells worldwide and produce and sell oil at cost, which I believe to be $5 a barrell. Why should a few dictators and a few arab sheiks drown in $$$ while the rest of the world suffers. The oil belongs to mama earth so let all of us use it at cost.
Comment by Andrew Weiszmann on 2008-05-25
The Congress never quite understood the energy problem fully. Right now we have the possibility of developing some new oil fields that could save us from distaster. It will take up to ten years for renewable sources to take up enough slack. The persistant emphasis on CO2 emmissions at this critical time does not help.
Comment by Blazer on 2008-05-26
that everyone that goes to Washington now becomes a raving idiot in less than 6 months. And the people continue to vote for these clowns. Instead of suing someone (of course we love to sue anyone in America)why don't these fools come up with an energy plan that actually works through use of alternative fuels, lowering speed limits, requiring better miles per gallon from vehicles, etc, etc, etc. These have been written many times over in the last 10-20 years. I guess when people can't afford to drive to work and declare a "Workers Holiday" will we get there attention. That's right, lets just not go to work for a day and see what happens. We need to take back control of our own destiny, almost like the Boston Tea Party. Let's do it the 2nd Monday of August, right in the midst of the Summer. And on that day everyone must either walk or take a bike ride. We'll fix the politicians and the rich who could give a crap about what the price of gas is or anything else for that matter. Just look at how they state the CPI to see how they manipulate everything. It's time to change it all for your children and their children to come.

The Blaze
Comment by Tony Ford on 2008-05-26
Its frightening! The politicians and the administration are running headless instead of managing the alternative energy solution.
It would be just as well if we could ignore these knuckle heads who run the USA economy but we can't at the moment.
What I do believe is that we are witnessing the start of a change in world order with the last superpower neither super nor powerful over time. Who or what will fill the vacuum?
Comment by R. Simpson on 2008-05-27
I totally agree but until the "Joe" on the street gets the straight dope from the government, the oil and auto industry which hasn't been the case for over 40 years they are going to belive it's just another conspiracy. When the electorate is ignorant we are going to get the results we've had and elect officials who promote anything but the truth, can you blame them?
SHARE / RATE