Rate:
Share
Views: 825
Text Size:
Make a Comment

Kodak Dumps Kodachrome

Film goes the way of the buggy whip

By Steve Christ
Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009


 

polaroid

 

At the ripe old age of 45, becoming a living and breathing anachronism is something that is kind of hard for me to admit. But the truth is, this far into it the world has left me in its dust.

Anything and everything is different these days. They call it all progress but sometimes I'm not real sure if I agree with them.

Take TV, for instance. Now that is something that's gotten considerably worse, not better.

In fact, it has gotten so bad that I can't even let my kids watch the commercials anymore for fear that they will ask me about the dangers of a four hour long erection— whatever that is.

By the way, is it just me or does anyone else ever wonder why they have to broadcast that little tidbit at dinner time? Some things are better off left for the fine print.

But that's not to say that everything new isn't worthwhile because what's new is what entrepreneur capitalism is all about. After all, if you build a better mouse trap the world really will beat a path to your door.

Of course, one of those better mousetraps is the digital camera. It's an invention so good it has sent the film of my youth the way of the buggy whip. And when I think about my Uncle's old Polaroid camera I just have to laugh.

Thirty years later, it is not exactly as cutting edge as I thought it was back in the day.

Neither, evidently was the Polaroid Corporation. After over 80 years of making instant film cameras, Polaroid went bust in 2008.

Even still, Polaroid's biggest rival managed to adjust and adapt to it all. Kodak survives, but in a slightly different form.

Kodachrome, however, has bitten the dust.

From the AP entitled: Sorry, Paul Simon, Kodak's Axing Kodachrome

"Sorry, Paul Simon, Kodak is taking your Kodachrome away.

The Eastman Kodak Co. announced Monday it's retiring its oldest film stock because of declining customer demand in an increasingly digital age.

The world's first commercially successful color film, immortalized in song by Simon, spent 74 years in Kodak's portfolio. It enjoyed its heyday in the 1950s and '60s but in recent years has nudged closer to obscurity: Sales of Kodachrome are now just a fraction of 1 percent of the company's total sales of still-picture films, and only one commercial lab in the world still processes it.

Those numbers and the unique materials needed to make it convinced Kodak to call its most recent manufacturing run the last, said Mary Jane Hellyar, the outgoing president of Kodak's Film, Photofinishing and Entertainment Group.

"Kodachrome is particularly difficult (to retire) because it really has become kind of an icon," Hellyar said.

The company now gets about 70 percent of its revenue from its digital business, but plans to stay in the film business "as far into the future as possible," Hellyar said.

Because of the complexity, only Dwayne's Photo, in Parsons, Kan., still processes Kodachrome film. The lab has agreed to continue through 2010, Kodak said.

Hellyar estimates the retail supply of Kodachrome will run out in the fall, though it could be sooner if devotees stockpile."

Someday it will all be gone.

Even still, watching that film develop before your very eyes was pretty cool.

Related Articles:

The True Cost of "Cheap Goods"

"Funemployment" Up as The Jobless Rate Heads Higher

Credit Card Companies Say "Let's Make a Deal!"

To learn more about Wealth Daily click here

Advertisement

The Most Profitable Energy Transition The World Has Ever Seen!

On November 12, 2008, the International Energy Agency (IEA) officially confirmed that every fossil fuel resource we rely on today will simply not be able to keep pace with demand.

As a result, the IEA stated in very clear terms that renewable energy will soon become the second largest source of energy.

Want to know which renewable energy source will take the lion's share of tomorrow's power generation?

Click here, and see where the experts are putting their money!


 




Rate this article:
 
     Current Rating:  
Article RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle RatingArticle Rating (3 votes)

Comment on this Article